9/11 Pentagon attack alternative evidence

Welcome to the Devils in the Details radio show live on skidbrostudios.com. Here's your host, Wine Russell. Welcome to the Devils in the Details radio show once again. Thank you for joining me here. We are having a beautiful day here in downtown Los Angeles. And, of course, I'm here live in Skid Row Studios, of course, on skidbrostudios.com. Now, let's see. All right. Now, I hope you – of course, my name is Wine Russell. Now, I have to cover that, of course. So my name is Wine Russell. And if you don't know that or if you haven't listened to the show, this is your first time listening to the show, welcome. And I hope you find this show with an open mind because you are certainly going to need it. Yes. Now, you know what? You can always call into the show. Please do. 1-800-893-9562. Share any thoughts or, you know, feelings you have about what I'll be discussing today. Today is a very earth-shattering topic. Now, this is – of course, if you haven't heard this information, it will be quite earth-shattering for you. But I do have to get in a quick message from last week. I did get an email. And, you know, we get emails from time to time. And sometimes they are positive. But this is a good time. And I'm going to give you a quick message from last week. I did get an email. And it's, you know, we get emails from time to time. And sometimes they are positive. And this one was an actual complaint, although it was very nice. But let's just say – let's call her Marianne R. from Albuquerque, New Mexico. And she's quoted that I stated on the last show that I was trying to sell conspiracy theories to children. And I listened back to the show and I made a comment that one of the definitions that I gave was for the kids or that the show was for the kids. Now, she misunderstood that. And obviously, I am not here trying to sell conspiracies. I'm here trying to sell conspiracy theories to your children. This show is for everybody. And I just want to let you know that my age demographic is 8 to 80. So that's pretty wide, right? But we have to aim for as many people as possible. So 8 to 80 here on The Devils in the Details. We're not cutting anybody out. And we're certainly not trying to sell any conspiracy theories to your children. But thank you, Marianne, for listening. You know, we do need – or downloading. And we do need your help here on The Devils in the Details. Now, so today, again, guys, this is fatal information. This is – we are revisiting 9-11 and the U.S. government's official story. And today we are visiting the morning of 9-11, Washington, D.C., the site just moments prior to the Pentagon attack. So here we go. So kiss me and smile for me. Tell me that you'll wait for me. Hold me like you'll never let me. Go. Cause I'm leaving on a jet plane. Don't know when I'll be back again. Oh, babe, I hate to go. So many times I let you down. All right. Thank you. That is the gimme gimme's. Good stuff, guys. So here we go. So I always have to say that this show is dedicated to the victims and survivors of the attacks. Now, I mean, the only reason. I do this show is for the victims and survivors of any attack, but certainly 9-11. And my respect goes to you and your families. And I certainly don't mean any disrespect with what I'm saying today. But let's start with this. So I'd like to preface the show with a thought. So I want to put a thought in your head. All right. So imagine you or I were on trial for any crime. It makes no difference whatsoever. And imagine that the body of evidence that I'm going to try to lay. Lay out for you today or unanswered questions was being used in a case against you or I, of course. Now, I want you to ask yourself, would you be found guilty if what I'm going to express or share with you was used against you? Now, I'll let you be the judge of that, of course. And I'll let you be the judge of the information that I'm providing. And always do your own research. And please look this stuff up because it is much needed to know information. Now. I. Welcome you all to the case of American Airlines Flight 77. And that was the flight that reportedly that was reportedly hijacked by five armed men with box cutters and was flown directly into the Pentagon. Now, that attack resulted in the deaths of 59 passengers, five hijackers and 125 personnel inside of the building. Now, let's. So obviously, we all know the official account. We saw. Or we are. We are told that a plane was hijacked, flew a huge circle and went straight and low right into the side of the Pentagon. That is certainly what we were told. Now, I am going to share some information from a investigation team called Citizen Investigation Team. And if you haven't referenced that, I'm going to give you the information where to find them. But we're going to have some opening remarks today from Mr. Craig Ranke. And he is the. Lead investigator there at the Citizen Investigation Team. And so let's listen to the opening remarks from Mr. Craig Ranke. In the following presentation, we will expose to you independent verifiable evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the 9-11 attack was a state-sponsored false flag black operation involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception at the Pentagon. Relying on detailed interviews with eyewitnesses to the event, the flight path of the jet that allegedly struck the Pentagon. And was seen flying treetop level over Arlington that day is conclusively established. As you will see, this flight path is very different from what the government reports. And we will explain the significance of this discrepancy momentarily. But first, we'll go over what initially made people suspicious of this event. All right. So we received that information. That is, of course, Craig Ranke himself. Mr. Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis make up the Citizen Investigation Team. Now, most of the information you hear today. Can be referenced and further studied at citizeninvestigationteam.com. And I urge you to go there. That is one of the greatest sites or the best sites for the discovery into what possibly happened that day at the Pentagon. Now, another source of today's presentation is the pilots for 9-11 Truth. Now, I know I've mentioned them on the show before. We should mention them on every show we do here. That is an amazing organization. And with the Citizen Investigation Team combined. They have. In my opinion, won a Nobel Peace Prize. Each. And these two groups have actually corroborated their information. Brought their investigations together. And they independently corroborate each other. And that is amazing. So, you know, they really have changed the world. Now, this information is world changing. But nobody wants to listen. Especially a government or somebody who could be held accountable. Right? So, in 2006. The pilots for 9-11 Truth. By way of the Freedom of Information Act. Received and analyzed data from the flight data recorders from Flight 77. So, a lot of the times you'll hear that these planes melted. Or just disappeared. And that is not the case. Obviously, because the government came up with. Or the NTSB. Which is the National Traffic. Pardon me. The National Transportation Safety Board. Came up with the black boxes. And this black box data. Which is the. Which is encoded. Was actually provided to the pilots for 9-11 Truth. Through the Freedom of Information Act. So, they used all this information to compute G-forces. And to just monitor or just to verify what exactly happened to the plane. And one of the things they discovered. And of course, we can't elaborate on the math. Because these are geniuses. And I am certainly am not. So, the. But the physics of the flight recorders. Right? The physics of the flight required. The physics of the flight. Meaning how low it was. How fast it had to be going. In short, of course. To simplify it. They found it mathematically impossible. So, if that intrigues you. Please go to Pilots for 9-11 Truth. And start referencing and start learning this information. Now, the NTSB provided this data. And it also includes the altimeter adjustment errors. That leave the plane at the Pentagon. Above the Pentagon. And not slamming into it. So, we discussed that on the first show. Very first show of Devils in the Details. And that was the show on 9-11. That was the five smoking guns of 9-11. Well, that altimeter adjustment is indeed a smoking gun. Because what happened was. Is, you know, by the government's own provided information. When the plane went up. You saw the altimeter correction. And what the altimeter is. Is a correction to judge the altitude. Based on barometric pressure. Now, I've only learned that through investigating what it is. But that has something to do with the weather. And how planes judge the distance to the ground. So, the altimeter is a major smoking gun. And that's who discovered it. Pilots for 9-11 Truth. And it was not readjusted on descent. So, when they went up. They made the correction in the altimeter. The correct altitude was judged. And everything was fine. On the way down. All pilots are supposed to make the same correction. And that correction was not made. And the NTSB provided that information. And that correction wasn't made. So, what that does. The results of that error. In their provided information. Means that the plane was too high. To strike the Pentagon. Now, that corresponds with everything that we're talking about today. With the CIT. Pardon me. That's a long thing to say. So, I'm just going to call it the CIT. All right. So, here we go. The flight path data. Does not correspond with the flight path damage. That is key with dealing with the Pentagon. Because it is not the same situation. That you're dealing with in the World Trade Center. Where the, you know. Obviously, the planes went into the buildings. And then the buildings were demolished around the planes. Or obviously, the planes were blown to smithereens. As the building came down. But the flight path. At the Pentagon is important. Because it locks the government into a specific trajectory. So, it means that the. They had to be in a specific spot. In a specific place. To cause the damage path. Okay. And what that corresponds to. Are light poles. Okay. And of course, the direction that it actually aimed into the building. But light poles were actually knocked down. And of course, we all know that. There were five downed light poles. So, in order for the. The. So, in order for the plane to have flown on the south side. Which is, we'll get to that. That is the official story. Or low and level. And hit those poles. And fly directly into the building. You know. They're locked into a specific data set. Or specific information that was supposed to be on that flight data recorder. And let me tell you that it wasn't. So, let me say one thing. You. You know. Whether it's tampered information. We're not going to speculate that. They don't speculate that. But they know that the information is not correct. Based on where they tell us the plane actually flew. So, the Pentagon. Unlike World Trade Center. The Pentagon was not televised. So, we didn't see. We've never seen a plane hit the Pentagon. And I have to ask you here in America. You have to ask yourself. Why? Why would we never see a plane or video evidence hitting the Pentagon? So, I'm going to give you a little bit of a hint. So, you know. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. I mean. It's an amazing question. It's a valid question. The most secure building in the world. In the photograph damaged areas. If you look at the damaged areas at the Pentagon. You see multiple roof mounted cameras. I mean they're right there. They're in plain sight. I mean you can see multiple cameras. Now, those cameras would have had no other vantage point than to stare directly into the alleged, you know, into the plane coming at them. They were looking right at it. If they're not down at the side of the building, wherever those cameras are pointed, they were in the right spot to either see the plane coming in or videotape the actual impact. But those videotapes do not exist. And if anybody has access to that or has seen that, please provide that because that is what has not been provided. And I tell you, the only video that we have seen from the Pentagon, and there is one out there, it is a choppy frame-by-frame odd-angle security gate. You know, video that everybody points to and says, well, there's proof that the 757 or Flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon. Here it is. Now, I urge you to stare at that, study that, watch that thing as slow as you can, which is frame-by-frame. And you only have a few frames to choose from. I mean, why are we dealing with slideshow-type technology? Why are we flip-booking the testimony to? What's removing our freedoms, if you understand that? Why are we doing something frame-by-frame when we live in the world of high-res video? Even in 2001, it was certainly better than what we're seeing in that silly, you know, video, security gate video. Now, interesting on that video was the date was inaccurate. That's always pointed out. Why was the date inaccurate? Who knows? Why would they? There's no answer for that. And the time was incorrect. Incorrect. So, you know, was this, you know, I certainly don't want to speculate, but tell me. I mean, think about that. What do you, how could you answer that? So, the government, all they really have to do is show us the tapes. That's it. So, you know, all of these investigations would go away. The questions would go away if they would just provide the tapes. Now, let's take a little deeper look. So, that was kind of a basic, right? A little basic information on the. The anomalies or issues. And we know where to find our investigation information. But now we're going to look a little deeper into what the government exactly let us know or reveal to us from their own provided information. Now, the government refuses to comment on anything found in the multiple investigations, either CIT or pilots for 9-11 Truth. So, let's revisit Mr. Norman Mineta's testimony in front of the 9-11 Commission. This is just a short one. During the time then, the airplane. The plane coming in to the Pentagon. There was a young man who would come in and say to the vice president, the plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out. And when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out. The young man also said to the vice president, do the orders still stand? And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, of course, the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary? No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. All right. All right. So, we all remember Norman Mineta testifying before the 9-11 Commission. And what did any of that mean? I ask you. Remember, Bush and Cheney refused to testify about 9-11 under oath. And they refused to have their comments recorded and or published. Now, why would they do that? If our president and vice president or government in whole was surprised on the day of 9-11, why would their reaction be not wanting to investigate it or not wanting to speak? speak about it under oath or not allowing their questions to be removed from the room in which they were asked. You know, I ask you, they didn't even allow the reporters to remove their pads. They said you can ask questions, you can write your notes down, but you have to remember them and leave the pads on the chair. Now, is this the reaction of a government that was surprised or shocked, you know, on the morning of 9-11? There's never been a surprised reaction from anybody in our government or the New York City government for that matter. They all seem to be like, okay, now we're just, we're going. You know, we're doing the agenda, we're doing the operation, we're all doing what we're supposed to do. You know, there were, obviously, there were faces of shock in those crowds, but the people in charge, I want you to go back and look at that. There's no real surprise there. And why did the president? Why did the president and the vice president not, you know, testify under oath? It's ridiculous. So I feel the president and the vice president absolved themselves of their responsibility for not protecting you or us or the victims. They just said, you know what, we're not responsible for that. We don't have to talk about that. We don't want to talk about that. So we are not. Wow. And unfortunately, the current administration has that same, you know, opinion or that same feeling. I mean. We're all still locked out of asking any questions about 9-11, which is crazy. So, you know, 9-11, you have to ask. And why the Obama administration wouldn't embrace these investigations? Think about it. If the Democrats and the Republicans are such sworn enemies, opposite sides of the aisle, you know, holding up the government because either side can't, you know, agree. And if they're so dramatically different. Then, I mean, what are, why isn't Obama jumping on this? And why doesn't the Obama administration, you know, investigate these matters? Well, just that fact alone may prove to you that both parties are identical and are working together. And I've told you that before on the show that I believe there is no left or right or Democrat or Republican. It is just all one power command structure. So every war, every law, every limit to your freedom is being perpetrated. And every law is being perpetrated as a result of 9-11. So please, this information is important and you have to worry about this. I mean, you have to worry about what was done. The event is over. So the, you know, the horror, the shock is gone. And now you can just sit down and kind of unwrap the layers and try to find out exactly what happened. So that's what we're doing. So the victory for Osama, if you think about it, every time they pull an NDAA or a Patriot Act or another, or drones now in America, you know, with our own drones. You know, we're not going to do that. We're going to do it. We're going to do it. We're going to do it. Our planet terror war, the NDAA, you know, said the entire planet is a battlefield. All of that is a result of 9-11. And Osama and his box cutter wielding army, right, the victories keep coming. It hasn't stopped. So in 9-11, you think that they were successful then. Well, it hasn't stopped because our freedoms are, you know, continuously being taken away. So finding the motive. So now let's look at a motive. So if we're in a little, you know, if you're thinking in your mind, if this evidence was used against me, you know, would I be held guilty? Well, you always have to look for a motive in why crimes occur. And there is a motive at the Pentagon. Now, finding one motive for 9-11 is impossible. We all know that. There are plenty of motives like putting in place the Hundred Year War as outlined in the PNAC document, how to rebuild America's defenses from the project for a new American century. Now, that is commonly covered in 9-11 circles, but that's something you have to know about. The PNAC created a document entitled How to Rebuild America's Defenses, and it was just expressed with, you know, Hundred Year Wars and how to rebuild our military structure. And we need a new catalyst like a new Pearl Harbor. And then all of this could actually occur, everything in their plan. And it was the same people who the day, the day of 9-11, they were like, And it was the same people who the day, the day of 9-11, they were like, And it was the same people who the day, the day of 9-11, they were like, this is like a new Pearl Harbor. And it was their own wording, so it's criminal, people. But our, you know, I think a lot of the motives had to possibly do, you know, and everybody had their different motives in 9-11. So whatever location it was, whatever was happening, there were multiple motives. One of the ones I'd like to mention possibly, possibly, was the rebuilding of the World Trade Center site from scratch, right? I.e. Larry Silverstein, you know, one of our favorite guys here. And, you know, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, John Lewis, and control because control is the ultimate outcome is really what they want from their money their power they want control so they get the money they get the power and they get the control much like Scarface's philosophy there now so the motive is money let's listen to the then Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld okay and this is Donald Rumsfeld from September 10th 2001 September 10th so the day before September 11th let's check out Rumsfeld the day before 9-1-1 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war not on foreign terrorists the adversary is closer to home it's the Pentagon bureaucracy he said money wasted by the military poses a serious threat in fact it could be said that it's a matter of life and death Rumsfeld promised change but the next day the world changed and in the rush to fund the war on terrorism the war on waste seems to have been forgotten my old three budget calls for more than 48 billion dollars in new defense spending more money for the Pentagon when its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25% of what it already spends according to some estimates we cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars in transactions 2.3 trillion with a T trillion dollars so our government are the Pentagon was personally missing trillions of dollars and that was made that was all noted September 10th 2001 saw Runsfeld you know if you want to really get down to the bottom of what the whole motive was or how what where the money came from well got a kind of an answer for that to you got to get ready for this because its D now it was from the plundering of the Soviet Union right of course obviously other nefarious acts, but it mainly came around 91, obviously, when the then-seated George Bush, George Bush I, of course, created what was called Project Hammer. We'll kind of get into that in a moment. But the location of the impact at the Pentagon was key, and it was decisive in defining the motive, the location where the plane hit. All right, so that was important. So the office that was hit was the Office of Naval Intelligence, which had just been relocated to the new anti-terrorism reinforced part of the building, another 9-11 coincidence. Imagine if that plane had hit any other part of that building that wasn't, you know, just reconstructed with their anti-terrorism, you know, glass and whatever they did to it. The death toll would have been a lot higher. I mean, they could have maybe destroyed half of the building, you know. But it hit a specific part of that building that had just been recently refurbished for anti-terrorism, you know, to be able to be hit by a terrorist. Now, how did they get that funding for that? Where did that all come from? It was from the Oklahoma City bombing. So one hand watches the other, right? We covered the Oklahoma City bombing on a prior episode. Please listen to that. But the, you know, that created legislation that then got the Pentagon and all these federal buildings up. And they saw the anti-terrorism efforts. Now, it hit directly into that part of the building. They called it the catcher's mitt. And you hear that all the time. They dubbed it the catcher's mitt. Very interesting thing to call it, right? So the Office of Naval Intelligence suffered 39 fatalities out of 40 in the office that day. And those are the facts they give us. So I imagine that out of obviously 40 people in the office, 39 died. So they lost almost the entire staff they had there, the complete chain of command, you know, all the records, computers, obviously all of that was also destroyed. Among many of the investigations happening in the office was the investigation of Project Hammer. Okay. Now, Project Hammer, the information on motive comes to us by way of alienscientist.com. We have mentioned him on the show before. That is great investigatory work there by alien scientist. Strange name, great guy. And you do have to look at his work. It is amazing. Now, let's listen to alien, let's listen to alien scientist himself explain about Operation Hammer. Now, here we go. In September 1991, shortly after the end of the Cold War, a cabal of elite bankers and intelligence spooks led by George H.W. Bush financed a $240 billion cover operations war chest through the purchase of 10-year securities that, as it happened, were scheduled to come due on September 12th, 2001. Project Hammer was undoubtedly, in fact, the first of the most important and most important investments in the history of the Soviet Union. It was used for a wide variety of illicit intelligence operations, but mainly it was used to finance a covert economic operation against the collapsing Soviet Union. A spectacular investment for all, at least until money laundering investigations began tracing all the money, or when the 10-year deadline came up and the securities became due and began the routine process of authenticity and ownership checks. Evidence shows that several federal and private investigations had already stumbled upon the Hammer Fund and were compiling evidence on it up until the 9-11 attacks. These included the Office of Naval Intelligence, or ONI, which was moved to the outer E-ring of the recently renovated section of the Pentagon that was targeted and destroyed on 9-11. Right, so he reaffirms where it was hit and also enlightens us on Project Hammer, which was a pool of money to become available, an investment pool of money. Now that is some economic stuff that you have to look into on what exactly Project Hammer was. But, it was becoming available September 12, 2001, and it was set up by George Bush I, right? So now imagine all this stuff is being used against you. So let's just think about that for a second. So just a few of these things. So man, you had some dealings in a Project Hammer, and they got some investigation work on you, and then you allegedly flew a plane into a building to destroy all the people inside to destroy the evidence about your case. Yeah, so how, I mean, how, I mean, you would be involved in the case of the century of the, you know, of the universe. Yet, nobody will listen to this information, and there hasn't been a case to hold anyone accountable so far. So the money was being investigated by the ONI, Office of Naval Intelligence, and it was trillions of dollars. Rummy mentions it the day of the attack. Or that these trillions of dollars were missing, and that they were looking for them. So a motive at the Pentagon, and we're going to call it a motive, was to hide the records and do away with anyone motivated about finding missing money. So they didn't like these guys prying around. And there were other investigations, too, and you can find that on alienscientist.com. But a motive that made sense to me was certainly this Project Hammer, where all the dates fit and all the conspirators certainly fit. Now, the motive, or, that's all speculation. You know, we're speculating, but of course, there is evidence. So let's just take a quick look at the evidence, and let's look at the north-side approach. Now, that is key, and if that's the first time you're hearing about it, this is important, because the citizen investigation teams work, came up with this north-side approach. Now, this is in combination with Pilots for 9-11 Truth. Government-supplied flight data recorder and 84th radar evaluation unit radar data. And they call that RAIDES data, R-A-D-E-S. And that data tells us, the RAIDES data tells us all the planes in the sky at the time of the attack and their movements. Okay? So you can reference all the details, of course, in a documentary film provided by pilots for 9-11 Truth entitled Attack on the Pentagon. You have to see that. It will explain everything I'm talking about here today. Now, the official story locks Flight 77 into a specific trajectory and damage path. Those, you know, as I stated, the light poles and the level so-called south side approach. So let's listen to, once again, Mr. Craig Ranke explain this north side approach. Here we go. In the final seconds before the alleged impact, a plane on the officially required flight path would have flown south. South of Columbia Pike, south of the Navy Annex, and south of the former Citgo gas station at all times. As it turned out, the eyewitnesses reported the complete opposite, proving the plane did not hit the building and that the physical damage had to have been staged. Thirteen eyewitnesses from the five most critical vantage points unanimously confirmed the plane crossed to the north side of Columbia Pike, flew directly over the Navy Annex, and north of the former Citgo gas station. Irrefutably confirmed. Contradicting all official reports, released data, and all physical damage alleged to have been caused by the plane. Right. So if all those buildings and street names don't make sense to you, the north and south approach in this context are delineated by a street. And it's called Columbia Pike. So if you look at a map of the Pentagon area, you'll see Columbia Pike as a street that leads directly towards the Pentagon. And it kind of, you know, is facing it. And then it kind of curves around a gas station, then onto a freeway. Now, the official story. And damage path, which had the plane, which the plane had to fly, right? Because we're locked into the light poles. The businesses, the Naval Annex, the former Citgo gas station, which is what we'll be talking about, and Arlington National Cemetery, they all had witnesses that spotted the plane on the north side. Eyewitnesses. Eyewitnesses using the case against you would put you in prison. Okay? There are 13 of them that showed this plane on the, or swore that this plane was on, on the north side of the gas station. And the, it was a Citgo gas station. They, they called it the former Citgo gas station. Now, if you use that as a center for the right and left, or the, pardon me, the south and north approach theories, the, the, the gas station separates it. Okay? So it either, it either flew on one side of the gas station or the other side of the gas station. Okay? And one is the south side approach and one is the north side approach. Now, every witness that the citizen investigation team found, found that they, found that they stated that the plane flew on the north side. The north side, not the south side. All right? So let's, let's take a look at these witnesses. Let's see what exactly they claim they saw. And of course you can find this in all the films I mentioned, but let's take a look at the witnesses. Here we go. All right. Thanks, Jimmy. I appreciate that. Very good. Now, one of the witnesses we have to talk about is Officer William Lagasse. Okay? And William Lagasse was a Pentagon police officer who was in his cruiser at the former Citgo gas station and testified to the life of a citizen. So he testified to the library, or pardon me, he testified to the library of Congress and he was interviewed by the citizen investigation team. Now Officer Lagasse states, and there's no reason for this man to lie. There's absolutely no reason for it. He's employed by the Pentagon. He's a police officer. He's an upstanding person. There's no reason for this man to lie. So his eyewitness testimony stated that he saw the plane on the north side of the gas station. The north side. Period. That he couldn't see through the gas station. He certainly wasn't facing the south side of Columbia Pike or the gas station. And he swears on his life that the plane flew on the north side of the gas station. So if somebody in court, an eyewitness, swears on their life that they saw you do a specific thing, you're gone, folks. So this is credible eyewitness evidence and testimony and that would convict anybody. But he also claims that, as most witnesses do, that he feels the plane crash. So these people, they state they saw it on the north side, but they also claim that they didn't see the impact. So the witnesses claim they were either running for their lives or they flinched or they weren't looking at the plane actually going in. They all say they saw the plane, but none of them actually claim they saw the impact. But the witnesses do testify, all of them, to seeing the plane flying on the north side of Columbia Pike and north of the gas station. They also agree on a bank the plane made as the plane came in. Now, there's no way the plane could bank if it had that low-level approach. This is key. And you have to watch the film. You have to listen to the witnesses in their own words describing this bank all the same way, which means the plane came over what was called the Naval Annex, which is a federal building there. It flew over the Naval Annex. They all saw it. They all testified to that. They saw it bank. And they all testified to that. And then they saw it fly towards the Pentagon. They saw the fireball, so they assume that it hit. But most of them claimed that they were running for their lives. So they also claimed that there was a gunning of the engine, a throttling up. So they said they saw it bank, and then they heard this throttling up. And the throttling up coincides and kind of makes, has the flyover theory makes sense. So essentially, the key is the bank. Of course, that cancels out the low and level approach. you know and it was way too high based on the altimeter for it to hit the building but very interesting that these people did see it low enough to possibly or an aircraft low enough to possibly hit the Pentagon now the gunning of the engines also fits the flyover we covered that which also is corroborated by the altimeter discovery the fact that upon the descent the altimeter was not reset is criminal I mean they have to answer for that the anomalies in the FDR data can only mean it has somehow been tampered with by the agency that provided it so let's let's hear what Sergeant Lagasse yeah we got time so let's hear what Sergeant Lagasse had to say about what he saw on the morning of 9-11 these are his own words and so let's hear from Sergeant Lagasse where did you see the plane coming from exactly what direction did you see it approaching well I saw it like I said if you look here we're on the precipitator right about where those transporters are yeah that's the first place I saw it cleared all these lampposts cleared all the light posts so it was heading towards you coming from Arlington Cemetery over there no no no no it was heading from left to right it came from that M-2 area so you're saying it was it came from to the north side of the Navy annex even yes what it did before what it did before those transformers I don't know because that's the first place I really saw it was right there but it was not coming towards me it was coming from left to right or from east or from west to east that stone fence that we just zoomed in on over there is the fence to the Arlington National Cemetery and as far as you can tell the fuselage was over that yeah I mean best guess estimate that's about where the fuselage was how high was it at that time about 100-150 feet AGL alright now how sure are you that the plane was to the north coming from the north side of the Navy annex it was pretty much between the Navy annex and Arlington Cemetery how certain are you of that 100% bet my life on it so there you go Sergeant Lagasse in his own words 100% he'd bet his life on the fact that he saw that plane on the north side of the gas station which contradicts the official story now and if it flew remember folks if it flew on the north side of the gas station it could not hit the light poles so if all of these people are telling the truth how did the light poles go down I ask you I also want to ask you how did the building shatter and how did the plane shatter into a million pieces but the light poles were merely bent they were knocked off their hinges so to speak they were knocked off their little bolts they didn't shatter they didn't splinter or fly away for a mile think about it 500 mile an hour plane allegedly slamming into light poles and they just bend over they bend and they just fall down just fall right next to it and they just fall right next to it to where they were knocked off that makes absolutely no sense because the plane then slams into the building and supposedly disintegrates because nobody can find a Boeing at the Pentagon so it's amazing that we believe these things we believe light poles bend but planes disintegrate so we all you know so anyway so we should all be under the jail by now if this evidence was stacked up against us Lord help us we would be in San Quentin or wherever the heck you know they send people like us now it's irrelevant for people to just think okay this is a point I really wanted to make that when we say the government orchestrated this we don't mean the entire government we don't think all the government is capable with this you know we're talking about the Bushes the Cheneys the Rumsfelds you know the money trusts the defense contractors the people of this world who could afford to do it and have the connections to pull it off right that's important now when I say the government I certainly mean the people of this world I certainly don't mean the entire government but just elements within it that you know certainly need to be brought to justice now I urge you to watch the national security alert that is they filmed by CIT and that is important though that is all the witnesses in the north side information I'm referring to the Arlington Cemetery witnesses were good they were key because they gave us that skimming over the top this naval annex and if you look at the pictures then you'll see that the naval annex is this huge building and they had the plane just skimming the top some of them said they even seemed like it was going to land on it so something was coming in what was it I mean I wish we knew that's what we're trying to figure out so if the plane was on the official south side approach I repeat the witnesses would not have seen the plane from their location but the longer the time passes you know longer the time goes by the less chance we will have to ever see this case in court so if you you know or ever really for those of you who are watching this video I'm not saying that this is a bad thing I'm saying that this is a bad thing but the only chance is for the full story to be revealed because a lot of these people were elderly even in two thousand and one so they're all kind of disappearing and so goes the story or the accountability right so one witness is reported to seeing the plane flying from the pentagon which is interesting so there was a witness on the back loading dock or at his station close to the back loading dock at the pentagon and he heard the explosion and he flew out to you know take a look and he saw a commercial jet and saw on the airplane It's all on the film, flying away from the Pentagon. And that certainly wouldn't have been an odd occurrence because it is next to Reagan National Airport. And it is not in the, I think it's called P-56, you know, that secure airspace over the Capitol and the White House. It is not part of that. It is across the Potomac in Arlington. And it's next to Reagan National Airport. So planes fly around the Pentagon all day. And it certainly didn't seem odd that this plane could have possibly just been flying away, you know. So just a witness account, if you believe it. Hey, it's certainly credible to me. But it raises big questions on was a plane seen flying away from the Pentagon? Yes. That answer is yes. So, but the longer, okay, so let's see. Let's move on. Now the witness in the film also described, so check this out. So they also described this mysterious C-130 craft. Cargo plane. We don't have time to go into the C-130 cargo plane. But there was two other planes in the sky above Washington that day. And it was a C-130 cargo plane and the E-4B, the doomsday plane. And we've all seen that on the news. That's common knowledge. But what were these planes doing there? And, you know, what was their function? We'll never have privilege to that information. But very questionable that that E-4B would just let this plane. Fly its huge circle, you know, the huge donut and be flown into the Pentagon. Why would the E-4B or the C-130 or whoever allow that? We already know the official story that they didn't have the jets available. It's questionable, right? And all the war games that were going on that kept those planes busy. But why did these other two just watch it happen? Because they were in the sky that day. Of course, I'm just speculating that they watched it. But the witnesses are a critical part of the CIT. He's an investigation. You've got to see him. If they had one-tenth of the evidence on us, we would be convicted. So remember, the burden of proof is on the government. And it's not on investigators to tell people how any of this happened. The burden is on the government to tell us how it happened. And they failed because everything that they tell us, these investigators completely tear apart. And it's not conspiracy theory, folks. This is actually investigation. This is actually investigations unwrapping a conspiracy that was done against us all. So let's look at the flight, the pilot, and the disappearing plane. If we can go through this, let's take a quick look. So Flight 77 was loaded with 64 people, including five hijackers. Pardon me, the five hijackers. The planes reported impact killed all aboard, including 125 inside the Pentagon. Piloting the plane was Charles Burlingame, who himself had participated in an anti-terrorism, or prior to the attack, and was a member of the United States. So he was a member of the United States. So he was a member of the United States. So he was a member of the United States. So he was a member of the United States. information if you look at the movies that he participated in an anti-terrorism exercise that actually simulated flying a jet into the pentagon just another one of those coincidences right but berlingame he was a good guy you know i certainly wouldn't make him a conspirator but a point i'd like to make about berlingame is that he may have been on that plane for a reason right uh that's what that's what they claim that maybe they were trying to get rid of these people and it's i always have to preface that that it is speculation of course but uh we have to ask these questions now uh the flight took off 33 capacity what flight takes off 33 capacity but most of the planes uh that on 9-11 were that capacity that's questionable uh we were told honey hanjour uh took control of the aircraft a 757 uh and he hijacked it of course with his minions and they steered it back towards the pentagon now uh honey hanjour we all know wasn't even able to pass his cessna's pilot license look into honey hanjour and his abilities to fly a 757 i don't think he had them uh yet he was able to pull off now this acrobatic 330 degree we've all seen that looping arrow maneuver that was almost impossible to even the most qualified pilots i mean not even to me i'm not i mean stunt pilots would have a problem pulling that thing off in 757 if it was a pilot that was able to pull off a 757 it was even possible right but the sweeping turn over the pentagon left the plane exposed for interception you know and remember cheney and minetta are sitting down in the bunker and you know they got these shoot down orders you know and they had the guy coming back and forth saying it's 10 miles out you know 20 miles out so uh you know shoot down orders were happening e4bs were flying around yet this thing just came you know came right in came right down came right down the north side of columbia right off the you know the naval annex the top of the naval annex to the north side of sitco gunned its engines and i would have to speculate launch something into the pentagon and flew right over it that is the outcome of what we're discussing today and uh i have a feeling that they are pretty accurate in their assessments now uh the uh the sweeping turn over the pentagon it left him open for like five i don't know what it was four or five minutes just just hang in there you know flying making a big turn uh and he could have easily been blown out of the sky but he wasn't because we have determined that cheney wasn't didn't have a shoot down order it was a stand down order to let whatever was coming towards the pentagon hit it we covered that in the first episode please uh take a listen to that but cheney certainly wasn't trying to shoot anything down you know because whatever hit was coming hit it so uh pilots for 9-11 truth analyzed this flight recorder and the radies data as i mentioned and verified that ci and verified so there we are so it's the corroboration of these two teams coming together so the eyewitnesses okay from cit corroborate the fdr data and the the the radies data from 9-11 truth so when one side saw what you know when when 9-11 pilots for 9-11 truth saw what uh you know cit was doing they came together and then when you look at it they corroborate each other and they're not the same thing they're not the same thing so the the radar data shows the north side approach not a south side on the radar data from the flight data recorder it is a north side approach when they provided the data to i believe it's rob balsamo from the pilots for 9-11 truth it was encoded so boeing encodes it and it's proprietary and you can't uh you know decode it yourself you can't hack into it you know it'll it'll be all messed up so they they the government provides the data to the pilots that knowing or understanding that, you know, the pilots for 9-11 truth couldn't do anything with it unless they had somebody either at Boeing or an expensive independent firm to actually decode it. Now, they actually took that information and from a diligent citizen who was concerned about what was going on, who worked at one of these places, they got it decoded professionally. And so the decoding gives us all of this corroboration to the eyewitness accounts that this plane did not fly on the south side approach as told us by the government, but on the north side and in or possibly over. Now, another thing you can speculate is that maybe these people didn't see an actual airliner and what they saw was some sort of winged missile. Just guessing, of course, just guessing, just trying to put the thought out there. But you never know. I mean, a few of the eyewitnesses that aren't in this film that were part of the news broadcast that day mentioned it as a small passenger jet with no windows. Small passenger jet with no windows, winged, flying 500 miles an hour. So, okay. So anyway, look into that because that sounds like a missile to me. And if everybody saw it, if that's the plane everybody saw, well, you know, they're all kind of... I mean, it's not like they're all just assuming possibly, you know, that that was a commercial jet, but they all saw it and it all came in on the right, the north side of the gas station. And that is important. So all of the investigations here are corroborating each other. And if it was used against us, folks, if any of this information was used against us, we would be certainly under the jail. Now, I also must mention the Ingersoll photographs. So, you know, Jason Ingersoll was a... He was a military photographer on the scene and his photographs served as evidence in the government's case and are available to the public. So I urge you, look into Jason Ingersoll's photographs and what they are is pre-collapse photographs of the Pentagon and all the damage. And when you see the photos, this is an investigation into 9-11 that all of us can do. You know, we can't go to Washington. We can't all go to Washington and be harassed like CIT did and Craig Ranke did, you know. But we can do investigations on our own. And we can do investigations on our own. And we can do investigations on our own. And we can do investigations on our own. Okay. So Jason Ingersoll. Download those. Check them out. And take a look and tell me if you can find a Boeing, a 757, or any evidence of a 757 hitting that building in those photographs. And if you can, you'd be the first person who is able to do that. And then you need to call me. Okay. We need to talk. But when you look at Ingersoll's photographs... The lawn is untouched. The foundation is undamaged. Now, the building is on fire and smoking. But there is only a 18 to 20-foot wide hole in the front of the Pentagon. And that's a controversial measurement. I know that. But, you know, in the movements or in all the investigations, everyone argues about the diameter or the measurement of this damaged hole. And stating that it couldn't fit a Boeing. Oh, yes, it can. No, it can't. It goes back and forth. But listen. 18 to 20 feet wide hole. Even if it's 20 feet wide, folks, we're going to... You know what? Let's have fun. So if they claim it's 18 feet, let's make it 40 feet wide. A Boeing is 120 feet wide. A Boeing 757 is 120 feet... Pardon me. 125 feet wide at its wings, 44 feet tall at its tail, and 150... 55 feet long. Hmm. So even if the hole was 40 feet wide, the plane is not going to fit. The plane does not fit. That is important. Now, look at these photographs. Look at the damage, okay, to the Pentagon. You tell me if you see a plane and if a plane can fit into that hole. Now, what we are told is that the plane is in the hole and that it has disintegrated. Or was, you know, blown into bits and no bits were actually found. Hmm. But we want to see it. So that is the proof we have, which is absolutely nothing. They say there's a plane in there. Trust me. It broke into millions of pieces because it hit all the columns. And there's really nothing to show you. Okay. Now, there are pictures of damage from inside the Pentagon. But none of the parts, you know, plane parts or whatever that was inside the Pentagon... Can be identified as a Boeing 757 or directly linked to the actual plane. You know, NC644AA, whatever it is. But so, you know, the investigations into the Pentagon, you have to really understand that it's different than World Trade Center. And they really have them dead to rights at the Pentagon. Okay. And it's based on the eyewitness testimony that would put you and I in jail, folks. And it was based on radar data provided by our own government. And these two things together, and I know I've said this repeatedly today, but this is the key. That these investigations together corroborate each other. And that is unique. Because in the World Trade Center, we don't have that. We have independent investigations that all work together. But nothing that teamed up and actually proved the other one correct. Okay. So if you believe in your government. That they would tell you the truth about 9-11. Then you would believe your government. That they would provide the correct flight data recorder information to, you know, pilots for 9-11 truth. So if they're telling the truth on one. Then they have to be telling the truth on the other. Right? Then the Pentagon was not hit by a Boeing. Based on their own evidence. Okay. Well, we ran out of time. Thank you for joining me here on the Devils in the Details radio show. This was an important... I hope you listened. Please. If you didn't, you know, go back. Download this thing. Replay it. Keep this one in your archives. You know, and look at these two investigations. They are key. So for Wime Russell and the Devils in the Details. I will be back next week to see you. Please join me. See you next week. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye.